| 1 |
On Sunday 07 November 2004 13:05, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 05:36:02 +0900 Chris White <chriswhite@g.o> |
| 3 |
> Too many categories. TOOOO MAAAANNNNYYY CATEGORIES!!! Split 'em up, |
| 4 |
> sure, but don't go overboard... 20 to 50 packages per toplevel is |
| 5 |
> probably a reasonable target. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
So, can we finally get something decided on arbitrary depth categories? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Not to put any additional pressure on portage devs, they are overworked as it |
| 10 |
is already, but just something like "yea, its a good thing, we can do it |
| 11 |
after such and such features are implemented" or "nah, we are going to just |
| 12 |
go with a flat list of packages in the future and resort to searches |
| 13 |
anyway" (to make both camps happy ;)). The tree, the way it is now, clearly |
| 14 |
does not scale. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
George |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives