1 |
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:45:09AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Ciaran McCreesh |
3 |
> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > On Sat, 31 May 2008 08:28:27 +0530 |
5 |
> > "Nirbheek Chauhan" <nirbheek.chauhan@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> >> Fact: It works. Unlike your vapour-proposal to "fix libtool". |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > But it doesn't work. And fixing libtool isn't vapour. Read the Debian |
9 |
> > patch. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Fixing libtool isn't vapour, neither is the debian patch, but your |
12 |
> plan/proposal to do is non-existant. You're just saying "Do this |
13 |
> because I say you should, I don't know how, but you should. Oh, and if |
14 |
> you don't you're all idiots". |
15 |
|
16 |
It's worth noting the debian patch was also rejected by upstream- |
17 |
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2004-05/msg00118.html |
18 |
|
19 |
Full thread in question- |
20 |
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2004-05/msg00097.html |
21 |
|
22 |
Basically, libtool upstream points at several rather hard issues to |
23 |
fixing it fully. Worth noting that was also in '04- 4 years later |
24 |
(with said debian patch in use), issue still is unfixed upstream. |
25 |
|
26 |
> >> Fact: Breakages are rare, code which causes it is discouraged anyway, |
27 |
> >> and is fixable in any case. We're not a standards organisation. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > You seriously think Gentoo has the manpower to go around making |
30 |
> > unnecessary changes to upstream code? And there's nothing in the C++ |
31 |
> > standard discouraging static initialisation. |
32 |
|
33 |
Considering static initialization doesn't always play nice on other |
34 |
platforms (porting rekall 2.2 on osx comes to mind), I'd expect the |
35 |
sources in question to be addressing the issue themselves frankly |
36 |
(which is what occured with rekall). |
37 |
|
38 |
Either way, basically it's coming down to if gentoo wants to follow |
39 |
the definition of 'academic' right, or 'pragmatic' right. Exempting |
40 |
ciaran, vote seems to be pragmatic. |
41 |
|
42 |
Cc'ing council, would like them to discuss this for upcoming meeting. |
43 |
~harring |