| 1 |
* Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Hi folks, |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
just a few thoughts: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> So yes, I'd love to see something like this someday. And I'd love to |
| 8 |
> help implementing it if such a decision was taken. But the question |
| 9 |
> remains : it obviously looks useful, but do we need it ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I already suggested an bug-reporting tool, which automatically |
| 12 |
collects all the necessary data, several weeks ago. This tool is |
| 13 |
simply called by commandline and asks the users several questions. |
| 14 |
Then it files an bug with some certain syntax and uploads necessary |
| 15 |
information (emerge --info, pkg-db extracts, ...). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Maybe this also could take some load from the bug wranglers, because |
| 18 |
based on the user's answers, the bugs could be formatted and assigned |
| 19 |
to the right persons without manual interaction. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I also like to have such an tool, and like to contribute. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So, now, let's start :) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Some points which (IMHO) have to be discussed: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
* shall we directly access BGO ? |
| 28 |
* what data should be sent ? |
| 29 |
* how to gather this data (directly look into /var/db/pkg) ? |
| 30 |
* what questions should be asked ? |
| 31 |
* should this tool create usual bugs or separate user-support bugs ? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
cu |
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 37 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 38 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 39 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 40 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 41 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 42 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 43 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives