1 |
Drake Wyrm wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:05:57AM -0500, in <401A0255.9010600@g.o>, John Davis <zhen@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>Drake Wyrm wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>>Just had an idea for a new USE flag. As a companion to the 'doc' USE flag |
7 |
>>>(which installs extra documentation), how about a USE flag which inhibits |
8 |
>>>/any/ documentation. This would be highly handy for trimming down a system |
9 |
>>>such as a server or router which will never have a warm body sitting in |
10 |
>>>front of it after everything is installed and configured. What say ye? |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>Why not put -doc in USE? If the ebuild is specifying docs to install |
14 |
>>using the doc USE, doing the above will negate that effect. All that |
15 |
>>needs to be done is make more ebuilds conform to it. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Because nearly every ebuild, even those which USE doc, installs the |
19 |
> normal documentation (e.g. manpages, texinfo, </usr/share/doc/${PVR}/*>) |
20 |
> even with USE=-doc. USE=doc results in *extra* goodies. |
21 |
> |
22 |
Then the flag is ambiguous - does it mean all docs or just "special" |
23 |
docs? I say the best way to go is to just make more ebuilds conform, |
24 |
perhaps add more documentation about the doc flag to the portage guide. |
25 |
|
26 |
Cheers, |
27 |
//zhen |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
John Davis |
31 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
32 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen> |
33 |
|
34 |
---- |
35 |
Knowledge can be more terrible than ignorance if you're powerless to |
36 |
change your world. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |