Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: John Davis <zhen@g.o>
To: Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed USE flag: nodoc[Message Scanned?][Message Scanned]
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:33:48
Message-Id: 401A0913.8080108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed USE flag: nodoc[Message Scanned?] by Drake Wyrm
1 Drake Wyrm wrote:
2 > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 02:05:57AM -0500, in <401A0255.9010600@g.o>, John Davis <zhen@g.o> wrote:
3 >
4 >>Drake Wyrm wrote:
5 >>
6 >>>Just had an idea for a new USE flag. As a companion to the 'doc' USE flag
7 >>>(which installs extra documentation), how about a USE flag which inhibits
8 >>>/any/ documentation. This would be highly handy for trimming down a system
9 >>>such as a server or router which will never have a warm body sitting in
10 >>>front of it after everything is installed and configured. What say ye?
11 >>>
12 >>
13 >>Why not put -doc in USE? If the ebuild is specifying docs to install
14 >>using the doc USE, doing the above will negate that effect. All that
15 >>needs to be done is make more ebuilds conform to it.
16 >
17 >
18 > Because nearly every ebuild, even those which USE doc, installs the
19 > normal documentation (e.g. manpages, texinfo, </usr/share/doc/${PVR}/*>)
20 > even with USE=-doc. USE=doc results in *extra* goodies.
21 >
22 Then the flag is ambiguous - does it mean all docs or just "special"
23 docs? I say the best way to go is to just make more ebuilds conform,
24 perhaps add more documentation about the doc flag to the portage guide.
25
26 Cheers,
27 //zhen
28
29 --
30 John Davis
31 Gentoo Linux Developer
32 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen>
33
34 ----
35 Knowledge can be more terrible than ignorance if you're powerless to
36 change your world.
37
38
39 --
40 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies