Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:14:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAHcsgXTDAB_=Tj6LjkdteYbK=ZZpG6BtasApeHpq-Sr-Jkyytg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Grandstanding aside, it is probably best to take this in chunks. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I just don't care to repeat for the Nth time the same reasoning for which I |
| 8 | don't want to mainstream VCS fetching. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | It's just not going to happen as long as I got CVS access, it's not a |
| 11 | threat or a grandstanding, it's a simple boolean logic statement. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 14 | flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour | Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> |