| 1 |
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:03:49 -0600 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| I keep hearing this, isn't there a real difference between a stage 1 |
| 4 |
| and a stage 3 install inasmuch as somebody who needs (or wants) to |
| 5 |
| dramatically tailor what's in the system profile can choose to do so |
| 6 |
| from a stage 1 or 2, but would have to remove packages after the fact |
| 7 |
| if starting from a stage 3? I wouldn't have a problem with that, as |
| 8 |
| long as we document it |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
emerge -e world && emerge -e world && emerge depclean |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Exactly the same results, except that it won't fall over and die |
| 13 |
because of unlisted circular dependencies. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
| but it just seems that the claim that the old and new methods produce |
| 16 |
| _exactly_ the same results seems to be stretching things a bit. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
How do you think stage3s are built in the first place? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives