1 |
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 23:05, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 03 May 2005 12:10 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
4 |
> > > I think an easier solution would be a portage rescue set of profiles. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > afaik the only thing it'd need is a 'make.defaults' and a custom |
7 |
> > 'packages' (where we'd force a newer version of portage of course) |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > i dont think we even need a set, we could just do it with one ... after |
10 |
> > all, we can stick bash code into make.defaults and have it do something |
11 |
> > ugly like run `uname` or parse make.defaults to figure out the correct |
12 |
> > ARCH |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If you're feeling up to the bash-fu, I was trying to propose something |
15 |
> simple, but this would probably be the best solution. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> So does anyone have any objections yet? ;] |
18 |
|
19 |
What about adding a "panic" mode to portage which, when confronted with a |
20 |
missing profile, (and after confirmation) continues to upgrade portage to the |
21 |
latest version it can find with some default settings that should allways |
22 |
work. |
23 |
|
24 |
Paul |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Paul de Vrieze |
28 |
Gentoo Developer |
29 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
30 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |