Archives
Archives
| From: | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles | ||
| Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:22:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1102094351.4301.3.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles by Jason Stubbs |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 23:32 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 | > Heh.. It'd take about 2 minutes to write and test the 3 lines of code to |
| 3 | > implement said enhancement. The question is, is this the correct enhancement. |
| 4 | > If so, why? I'd be more inclined to use a file to define a profile as being |
| 5 | > "valid" rather than "invalid". |
| 6 | |
| 7 | That's kinda like defining a profile as "non-deprecated" rather than |
| 8 | "deprecated." To me, it doesn't make sense to say when something works |
| 9 | properly -- that should be expected. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Identifying inherit-only / usable profiles | Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org> |