| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/09/15 06:06 AM, Duncan wrote: |
| 5 |
> Paweł Hajdan, Jr. posted on Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:20:13 +0200 as |
| 6 |
> excerpted: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> A user asked for optional gtk3 support in www-client/chromium: |
| 9 |
>> <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559378> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Talking about browsers and gtk3, I read that binary distros are |
| 12 |
> starting to ship firefox built against gtk3, now. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And with that happened, they'll likely be eager to deprecate |
| 15 |
> gtk2, as I think firefox was the big hold-out making that |
| 16 |
> impractical. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Firefox's use of gtk3 actually still requires gtk2, so gtk2 won't be |
| 20 |
deprecated (at least not any time soon). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Also, FYI, since gtk2 will (for the forseeable future) always be |
| 23 |
required by the firefox core, we are going to add a gtk3 flag to |
| 24 |
provide end-user control of building the frontend against gtk3 or not. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I don't think deprecation of gtk2 is anything we are going to need |
| 27 |
to worry about any time soon. |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXwUQcACgkQAJxUfCtlWe1r4QEAwJ4VQLTQhHe9Mx6DocDtkk0k |
| 32 |
TXYlocHSXPqrb907jx8BANABAaCToAOPnKchenrMLJxQFh0euC1Ku0ki8H9TwJtu |
| 33 |
=p0Fr |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives