Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Proposal: Social Contract change & What is "Gentoo" ?
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:36:53
Message-Id: 20040911113639.GB9039@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Proposal: Social Contract change & What is "Gentoo" ? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:35:14AM -0700, Duncan wrote:
2 > I did notice the contrasted wording between the two clauses,
3 >
4 > * free knowledge... contributed by /various/ /developers/..
5 >
6 > * free software... developed by /various/ /Gentoo/ /developers/..
7 >
8 > Was the omission of the word /Gentoo/ in the first case intentional?
9
10 It was, but it looks like it's better if I remove "Gentoo" from both
11 clauses. Concerning "Gentoo", we shouldn't make any difference between
12 Gentoo and non-Gentoo developers.
13
14 Updated the proposal.
15
16 Wkr,
17 Sven Vermeulen
18
19
20 --
21 ^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good.
22 (oo) Sven Vermeulen
23 (__) http://www.gentoo.org Documentation & PR

Replies