| 1 |
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:45 +0100, Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Jan 31, 2008 12:32 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:05:26AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 6 |
> > >> I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday |
| 7 |
> > >> should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as it won't affect any |
| 8 |
> > >> user who has a version of portage released in the past ~1.5 years. |
| 9 |
> > > So, since it seems nobody objected it, time for the announcement? And the |
| 10 |
> > > removal (server-side by robbat2) would be best done right before the |
| 11 |
> > > snapshot? |
| 12 |
> > It's pretty much irrelevant to the snapshot. wolf31o2 has my patch to |
| 13 |
> > exclude digests in the snapshot anyway. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Then I guess it could be done as soon as the doc patch is prepared... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It really is best done in the tree first, so everything is correct for |
| 19 |
the snapshot. We didn't have much issue last time because we push |
| 20 |
"manifest1_obsolete" into the snapshot, so digests are removed, anyway, |
| 21 |
but I'd *really* prefer if this were done prior to the snapshot being |
| 22 |
made. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The less fudging I have to do with the snapshot, the better. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 28 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 29 |
Games Developer |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives