Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | ||
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:14:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200507291611.47342@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die by Dan Armak |
||
| 1 | On Friday 29 July 2005 16:05, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 | > Anyway, the effective change would be to die if patching fails (and support |
| 3 | > patchlevels != 0), so my orig question stands. |
| 4 | epatch already takes care of failing, that's why I was thinking about that :) |
| 5 | |
| 6 | -- |
| 7 | Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò |
| 8 | Gentoo Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
| 9 | (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64, Sound, PAM) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |