1 |
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 05:34:16PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> >>>>> On Wed, 03 Nov 2021, Rich Freeman wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:03 AM Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> >> |
6 |
> >> This is not about finding solution to upgrade the system (in this case |
7 |
> >> it was enough to force PYTHON_TARGETS=python3_8 for portage). This is |
8 |
> >> about raising awareness that Gentoo is a rolling distribution and that |
9 |
> >> we guarantee users to be able to upgrade their system when they do world |
10 |
> >> upgrades just once a year (remember: in my case the last world upgrade |
11 |
> >> is just 4 months old!). If they cannot upgrade their system without |
12 |
> >> manual intervention, we failed to do our job. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > Do we have this "guarantee" documented somewhere? I thought I've |
15 |
> > heard six months tossed around. You say one year. It seems |
16 |
> > reasonable to have some sort of guideline like this and try to stick |
17 |
> > with it, at least for @system. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> We do. Summary of 2009-11-09 Council meeting: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> | https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20091109-summary.txt |
22 |
> | |
23 |
> | Upgrade path for old systems |
24 |
> | ---------------------------- |
25 |
> | Vote (unanimous): The ebuild tree must provide an upgrade path to a |
26 |
> | stable system that hasn't been updated for one year. |
27 |
|
28 |
Does "upgrade path" imply a simple world upgrade is all that should be |
29 |
necessary to upgrade the system? I wouldn't interpret it this way. |
30 |
|
31 |
> | Action: leio will start a discussion on gentoo-dev on if and how to |
32 |
> | support upgrading systems that are outdated more than a year. |