| 1 |
2016-02-14 21:23 GMT+01:00 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change |
| 7 |
> > > > the virtual back. One-line change. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the |
| 10 |
> > > default to eudev in the first place. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > OH, my, this is looking more like you are being paid by systemd peeps... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> honestly ? cut the crap man. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > You are just refusing to acknowledge these simple facts. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > systemd.................: irrelevant to this decision |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > standalone systemd-udev.: Vehemently unsupported, support for its |
| 21 |
> > capability to exist is planned to be punted |
| 22 |
> > in the future. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > eudev...................: fully functional, actively developed, |
| 25 |
> > and fully supported, mature project, been |
| 26 |
> > around for years. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and |
| 29 |
> develops against. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
This is NOT true, major distro use systemd, NOT udev as we use it. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Neither this is totally true, or put another way, everybody which is NOT |
| 40 |
using systemd is using eudev (or some form of static /dev). |
| 41 |
So obviously this is totally relevant for people that don't use systemd. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Also, why, why people using systemd ARE interested in this thread? |
| 44 |
You should not be interested at all. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> > Oh and here is one final piece that should blow your reason away |
| 49 |
> > |
| 50 |
> > https://github.com/gentoo/eudev <== NOTICE that it's upstream is |
| 51 |
> > within our gentoo domain. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> irrelevant. any Gentoo dev can create any repo in that namespace even |
| 54 |
> when they shouldn't. the fact that eudev is in there does *not* mean |
| 55 |
> the whole Gentoo project has signed on to it, or that it's some sort |
| 56 |
> of "banner" project. it means at least one Gentoo dev decided to do X |
| 57 |
> and our project system doesn't require project consensus before X can |
| 58 |
> proceed. do not conflate these. |
| 59 |
> -mike |
| 60 |
> |
Archives