| 1 |
On 14 Feb 2016 11:41, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:00:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > If, for any reason, eudev should be abandoned - we can just change |
| 5 |
> > > the virtual back. One-line change. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Which is precisely the corresponding argument for not switching the |
| 8 |
> > default to eudev in the first place. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> OH, my, this is looking more like you are being paid by systemd peeps... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
honestly ? cut the crap man. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> You are just refusing to acknowledge these simple facts. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> systemd.................: irrelevant to this decision |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> standalone systemd-udev.: Vehemently unsupported, support for its |
| 19 |
> capability to exist is planned to be punted |
| 20 |
> in the future. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> eudev...................: fully functional, actively developed, |
| 23 |
> and fully supported, mature project, been |
| 24 |
> around for years. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
udev: it's the default in every major distro that everyone tests and |
| 27 |
develops against. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
eudev: no one of any relevance outside of Gentoo runs it. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> Oh and here is one final piece that should blow your reason away |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> https://github.com/gentoo/eudev <== NOTICE that it's upstream is |
| 34 |
> within our gentoo domain. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
irrelevant. any Gentoo dev can create any repo in that namespace even |
| 37 |
when they shouldn't. the fact that eudev is in there does *not* mean |
| 38 |
the whole Gentoo project has signed on to it, or that it's some sort |
| 39 |
of "banner" project. it means at least one Gentoo dev decided to do X |
| 40 |
and our project system doesn't require project consensus before X can |
| 41 |
proceed. do not conflate these. |
| 42 |
-mike |
Archives