1 |
On 2020-08-06 14:22, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
>> - I am not 100% happy with the title but the 50 char limit |
3 |
>> doesn't allow any more details. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Yes, the title doesn't say a thing why would anyone want to read this |
6 |
> news item or not. |
7 |
|
8 |
Maybe |
9 |
|
10 |
> Be aware of possible reboot problems |
11 |
|
12 |
instead? |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
>> - No Display-If condition because it is neither a genkernel nor |
16 |
>> kexec-tools issue. We maybe even have additional packages |
17 |
>> which are appending to kernel command-line I am not aware of. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Showing this news on all old and new Gentoo systems makes little sense. |
20 |
> Either someone is newly affected, then Display-if should determine it, |
21 |
> or someone is *not* newly affected, then you're either telling him |
22 |
> something he already knows or something that is of little value to him. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> News items should be precisely this -- news. Not random pieces of |
25 |
> information you've just discovered and want to share with everyone. |
26 |
> This is what documentation is about, and it should be in some kernel- |
27 |
> related piece of documentation (handbook?) and not scattered around |
28 |
> in news items. |
29 |
|
30 |
Sure, you are basically repeating what I wrote in my prolog. |
31 |
|
32 |
But the reason why I drafted that news item despite of this is the |
33 |
consideration that an unbootable system outweigh the risk to waste |
34 |
anyone's time to read something even if they are not affected. Note that |
35 |
news items will appear through multiple channels. So if this will help |
36 |
someone who didn't read documentation before or just didn't realize the |
37 |
obvious risk he/she is taking when using non-persistent names ("It |
38 |
worked that way for me past 15 years!") I believe it has served its purpose. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Regards, |
43 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
44 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |