From: | Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Brett Simpson <simpsonb@××××××××××××××××××.org> | ||
Cc: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers. | ||
Date: | Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:05:00 | ||
Message-Id: | 20031205204513.GA29185@cerberus.oppresses.us | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers. by Brett Simpson |
1 | On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 03:10:36PM -0500, Brett Simpson wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > We are using Gentoo in a production server environment but recently management |
4 | > has been asking questions mostly because Gartner only recommends SuSE or |
5 | > Redhat Enterprise Linux. |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | Yeah, the same analyst group who has in the past claimed Windows has a |
9 | lower TCO. I'd sure want to listen to them... 8) |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Jon Portnoy |
13 | avenj/irc.freenode.net |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo for production servers. | Don Seiler <rizzo@g.o> |