| 1 |
Alexander Gretencord [arutha@×××.de] wrote: |
| 2 |
> As said earlier, it's ok to tell the people that reiser is not stable in your |
| 3 |
> opinion, but tell them _why_! That's my whole point, nothing about being |
| 4 |
> emotionally attached to reiser (tho I use it and am happy, but I also use XFS |
| 5 |
> and am happy) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Just as a point of interest, I'm not attached to it either. I'm currently |
| 8 |
using XFS on my laptop, as I tend to keep a standard enough kernel there |
| 9 |
that I can manage any conflicts that do come up. I've not really had time |
| 10 |
to research JFS. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In general, I don't think it's necessary to warn people about using it. If |
| 13 |
someone is interested in using a filesystem it's their responsibility to |
| 14 |
read about it first and make an educated decision. It's not the place of a |
| 15 |
few people to tell you what you shouldn't run, with the exception of proper |
| 16 |
labelling of experimental software. Giving links to more information about |
| 17 |
a filesystem is one thing, warning them away from using it seems to me a |
| 18 |
bad idea. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Unless of course you are shooting for the "Stupid User" segment of the |
| 21 |
population. However, I think there are more than enough distributions to |
| 22 |
covering that already. |
Archives