| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 01/12/2015 07:29 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 6 |
> <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> One issue with DSA/ElGamal is the requirement for a random k |
| 9 |
>> value while signing/encrypting, |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Thanks - that was very informative. I guess the thing that makes |
| 12 |
> me more concerned about RSA is that Shor's algorithm makes it |
| 13 |
> quite possible that it will be defeated at some point in the |
| 14 |
> future, perhaps without public disclosure. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Shor's would be effective against discrete logs (including ECC) as |
| 17 |
well, so wouldn't be applicable to this selection. For post-quantum |
| 18 |
asymmetric crypto we'd likely need e.g a lattice based primitive. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 22 |
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 23 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUtBYdAAoJEPw7F94F4TagA0cP/1fUOfyn+goHBJUPsrqNBt72 |
| 27 |
tkEShCRRtdqwknPf5XYR5oM3jRpG9QZ4L89vjXC/3SklIT1wz+IFLkUgJHbfg33k |
| 28 |
rbmr6oMXbQaqHami3l646DMjoqItLl1Nlnd5sqTVSBEB16KiJGE3oCVTAX6KisFW |
| 29 |
72chafJh+4x9Cbbt48PL1FjCiLDunokCOHPtbXthkL2NJaPnIJh7HHCQk2CtgFZX |
| 30 |
tER2gXai7VsQMMQdO9VuwNvrFS1svWFK97Eba1xgQx7tMg4hxWJadQphlwMKMEj+ |
| 31 |
uvZZ0HE708AUYBah+VCNJRFbJpyoND+7prUR19MnleUfehLWZHNUaOc1G8PK8X2b |
| 32 |
GhH6fe2wft05e8jrfMgV0acECqdvsb82zvfYQRVksQbtxdhTB3ObPcBLYveG6tQU |
| 33 |
IKLv47imTGAIW+Hwqk7EYQpLAMCcNhLmnwOdIe3CT+pvnluiGKZ55O67DJvE5QPS |
| 34 |
goPkh8nmSRIcLdCYyJxU0X+nODQLUNi0sb1b8ryKM1OLz2jSq2vhehet0jZ8vu2T |
| 35 |
0FpHKKo0dK7QTQQMmaoQ4Opfe3fff3kROhq3o0h6XMEg6niyzObg87ULecqKq59w |
| 36 |
CfeYHq6RIKnc3Yfn0flzcAlKXVlW+dpcHS1hXHiaLrO6iVtvtfZxBG4mAUZuqWyi |
| 37 |
k4FfOwRIvhFN5nTvM/TF |
| 38 |
=yIog |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives