1 |
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 05:50:59 -0500 |
2 |
"David J. Olsen" <lude@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Is it me, or is Netscape V4 horribly outdated? |
5 |
|
6 |
It may be, but that doesn't help. Netscape is often the only browser |
7 |
available on many machines (think RedHat 6.2 and people that don't |
8 |
build their own software), and is even more often the only browser |
9 |
worth using (not everybody has an Athlon 1000). |
10 |
|
11 |
I feel his argument is valid. I just checked the website with |
12 |
Navigator 4.08 and, while it seems fine to me, it is borderline |
13 |
too wide. |
14 |
|
15 |
Whether or not this is enough to necessitate changing the website |
16 |
is not up to me to decide. |
17 |
|
18 |
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 09:17:14AM -0500, Pann McCuaig wrote: |
19 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/build.html |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > It's probably either the table describing partitions or one of the <PRE> |
22 |
> > sections. Whatever, I can't view the site in Netscape (4.77, Linux |
23 |
> > 2.2.19) without horizontal scrolling. This sucks. |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > <RANT> |
26 |
> > Web pages that require horizontal scrolling suck. All web page authors |
27 |
> > should check this against multiple browsers at multiple resolutions. |
28 |
> > </RANT> |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > If I can't read this document comfortably I'm certainly not going to |
31 |
> > install your distribution or tell others how wonderful it is. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Jon Nelson |
37 |
C and Python Programmer, Code Gardener |
38 |
Just because it's not broken doesn't mean we can't take it apart. |