1 |
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
2 |
> It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being |
3 |
> dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of |
4 |
> keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how |
5 |
> about the following addition to the Social Contract? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> <heading>We will be run by the Development Community</> |
8 |
> Gentoo will be run by the development community. We will never allow |
9 |
> ourselves to be reliant upon a single sponsor or corporation. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> |
13 |
As I understand it, Gentoo is a "tax-exempt foundation" registered in |
14 |
the state of New Mexico. As a result, there are legal restrictions on |
15 |
"sponsorship", etc. Before modifying the "Social Contract", I'd |
16 |
recommend consulting an attorney with expertise in such matters. The |
17 |
last thing Gentoo needs is major legal hassles. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, FBG, AB, PTA, PGS, MS, MNLP, NST, ACMC(P) |
21 |
http://borasky-research.blogspot.com/ |
22 |
|
23 |
If God had meant for carrots to be eaten cooked, He would have given rabbits fire. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |