| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/16/2015 07:09 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 6 |
> <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Hi all, |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
.. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'll go ahead and start a tangent on this thread right here. As a |
| 13 |
> first step can we separately consider the proposal to require a |
| 14 |
> revbump anytime a package's RDEPENDS changes? I'm referring here |
| 15 |
> to directly-specified RDEPENDS, not those inherited from an eclass |
| 16 |
> or virtual. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I agree completely that we need to solve the eclass and virtual |
| 19 |
> issue and that is by far the stickier part of the mess. However, |
| 20 |
> can we at least get ebuild authors to stop making changes to their |
| 21 |
> RDEPENDS without revbumps? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
That would certainly be a step in the right direction |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
fwiw, I've been running for quite a while with dynamic deps disabled |
| 26 |
on a few of my computers for quite some time, specifically the |
| 27 |
workstations (desktop/laptop), and the sun hasn't dropped out of the |
| 28 |
sky yet. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 33 |
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 34 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJV+qdvAAoJECULev7WN52FfBEIAIuONm0m+pxG2q+5ATlY2jgj |
| 38 |
GI9mVVi0R2AF8/9zqnBYmVAUaK7Hizn/yMBRkMasJt/J3SiQkuVwnnynwY8mIjOf |
| 39 |
hHFAd205asghcvZsNLl4idiVxN6BsJYTFOgVjLfTYwqyNIESsrlyNULz8UZGZsDr |
| 40 |
6X/pdX7LZSW3gkPMN/rrasOvHyu/hQ2Pp75WK8YxmJwqxIlAxSWuO4Znjf1Sl2n8 |
| 41 |
qfwaAK5XXTEUG+h+sP8OGNhGsb9Tm+pFGmlJ4LpiiN2DPkg0i4oXK4Wec7U5Aana |
| 42 |
GaggPYGeH3XWld47ZhV2pXyyw8nGDz7R7rXCVFoSmC9a1sEvRH4jHQXRUgagmwI= |
| 43 |
=wxzt |
| 44 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives