1 |
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote: |
5 |
> > > > Hi, |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as |
8 |
> > > > an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Thanks for all of the great suggestions and feedback! |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > This is round two. I have update the ebuild with all your |
13 |
> > > suggestions. I have also added support for eselecting between mutt |
14 |
> > > and neomutt. Before the eselect ebuild can land though, we need to |
15 |
> > > rename the mutt binary so that the managed link can be called |
16 |
> > > mutt. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > What for? How many people are exactly in the dire need of having both |
19 |
> > installed simultaneously and switching between them? If you really can't |
20 |
> > learn to type the new command, add IUSE=symlink blocking original mutt |
21 |
> > and be done with it. Don't add more unowned files to /usr by another |
22 |
> > poorly written eselect module. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Be nice! No need to be bitchy here (and in the rest of your review). |
25 |
> Nicolas is just trying. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Me, as maintainer of Mutt, thought it was a good idea, because it allows |
28 |
> people to easily have both installed at the same time, which in this |
29 |
> interesting time for both projects is not a weird thing to have. |
30 |
|
31 |
I don't see how eselect helps that. People can just run neomutt by |
32 |
typing... neomutt, right? It works without the symlink, right? |
33 |
|
34 |
> If there is a policy/move to get rid of eselect, then sorry, I am not |
35 |
> aware of that. I can live with a symlink USE-flag. It doesn't seem |
36 |
> very elegant to me, but it would work for this scenario. |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
The move is against orphaned files in /usr that are randomly changed by |
40 |
runtime tools rather than the package manager. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Best regards, |
44 |
Michał Górny |