Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 May 2017 07:47:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20170530094719.16e922f6@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE) by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 30 May 2017 00:01:16 +0200 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > >>>>> On Mon, 29 May 2017, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > Also, can we find a better name? Sorry for the bikeshedding at this |
| 7 | > early stage, but I believe that ENFORCED_USE can be easily confused |
| 8 | > with use.force in profiles. MAPPED_USE? USE_MAP? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Why do we even need a new name ? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE) | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |