1 |
Hi guys. |
2 |
|
3 |
I tried to count how many packages we already have in sci for that previous |
4 |
message (recruiting new devs) and realized we are at 180 solely in app-sci |
5 |
already. So, should we split this? I envision something along these lines: |
6 |
|
7 |
sci-stat statistics, data analysis |
8 |
sci-simu simulations, MD, Monte Carlo, etc. |
9 |
sci-hpc high performance computing, clustering |
10 |
sci-libs well, libs essentially |
11 |
sci-misc everything else |
12 |
|
13 |
possible other if they warrant a separate category |
14 |
sci-linalg linear algebra packages, kind of covered by sci-libs for most |
15 |
sci-symbolic symbolic algebra stuff, again, does not seem to be that many of |
16 |
these so that hey wouldn't fit into sci-misc.. |
17 |
|
18 |
Some stuff may be moved from elsewhere. For example dev-lang/R may be better |
19 |
suited for sci-stat, as this is essentially data-analysis package (I know |
20 |
people look for it under app-sci when I tell them there is such a thing. And, |
21 |
btw, search does not quite work in that particular case, its just one latter |
22 |
which is also uppercase :)). |
23 |
|
24 |
Would that be all or did I forget something? 5 categories would give us 35-40 |
25 |
packages per cat, so there is even some room for expansion. There are ~100 |
26 |
more packages fresh sitting in bugzilla, but I think we will only be able to |
27 |
realistically deal with them after we get some more devs onto sci herd (see |
28 |
my other todays message to gentoo-science). |
29 |
|
30 |
George |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |