| 1 |
At 2004-05-31T19:32:31-0400, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2004-05-31 at 15:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 31 May 2004 03:24 pm, stan wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > or masked and unmasked etc |
| 5 |
> > > So that bugs against ~x86, ~ppc64 etc can be differentiated more easily |
| 6 |
> > > from reports on packages that have been marked stable. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > i dont think it'd really be used all that often |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I would have to agree. Especially since most people don't use half the |
| 11 |
> drop downs as it is... so much so that I barely even notice what is in |
| 12 |
> them, since 95% of the time, it is simply the defaults and gives no |
| 13 |
> information. I *will* look there before requesting that information |
| 14 |
> from the user, but as I said, it tends to always be the defaults. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Would it be the least bit helpful if non-devs who wish to help went |
| 17 |
through incoming bug reports and made sure that all the relevant |
| 18 |
information was there? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? |
| 22 |
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. |
| 23 |
--Ghost in the Shell |
Archives