| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 22/07/14 02:36, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
> William Hubbs: |
| 6 |
>> My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is |
| 7 |
>> that the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then |
| 8 |
>> have to hit the arch teams, which we know are overworked anyway, |
| 9 |
>> with stable requests just because we changed the dependencies. |
| 10 |
>> Isn't that causing a lot of possibly unnecessary work for our |
| 11 |
>> arch teams? |
| 12 |
> Procedure over logic? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Just commit it straight to arch if repoman doesn't complain. |
| 15 |
William, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
this is, as Julian pointed out, a problem you can solve by changing |
| 18 |
your policies. This is not a problem related to the Portage software, |
| 19 |
in which dynamic-deps are broken. |
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Alexander |
| 22 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 23 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlPOMgYACgkQRtClrXBQc7VuuwD/UNQzX5aHSBbfXhyYRxH4oYzK |
| 29 |
N9aEf88WLVJK2JVKJBkA/iDF6ozQ9I0WKWpi/jvZa/W7yxKeZsXu5ACa5mbgM88+ |
| 30 |
=9/RG |
| 31 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives