1 |
Bob Phan wrote: |
2 |
<snip> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Personally, I feel an even more elegant way to solve this, that would |
6 |
> benefit more than just custom categories, is to allow CONFIG_PROTECT |
7 |
> to contain individual files as well directories, which is very simple |
8 |
> to implement. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> It would also be nice to be able to un-protect files and |
11 |
> subdirectories of protected directories, but that probably wouldn't be |
12 |
> as simple to implement. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
I do agree that it would be nice to add individual files to |
16 |
CONFIG_PROTECT, but I also think a 'CATEGORIES' variable has merit. This |
17 |
allows the separation of stock gentoo categories from custom ones. For |
18 |
example, in make.conf, you specify the USE variable you want for your |
19 |
system while make.defaults holds the profile default USE variables. I |
20 |
prefer to have my configuration in a standard place (e.g. |
21 |
/etc/make.globals or /etc/make.conf). |
22 |
|
23 |
Let me know what you think. |
24 |
|
25 |
Zach |