Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:15:34
Message-Id: 03f64ec5-8b6c-186b-e20c-cca5aef413dd@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Brian Dolbec
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 10/02/16 12:09 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
5 > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:26:12 -0600 William Hubbs
6 > <williamh@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 >
9 >>> Often the decision to procrastinate is a decision that is
10 >>> rewarded. That should be considered carefully.
11 >>
12 >> + 10000.
13 >>
14 >> I also saw another issue that made me shudder. If we change
15 >> the default to eudev, people who are running separate /usr are
16 >> going to think they can kill their initramfs's, because people
17 >> in gentoo conflated the separate /usr and initramfs issue with
18 >> udev [1].
19 >>
20 >> William
21 >>
22 >> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573760#C4
23 >
24 > That isn't a worthwhile reason to procrastinate. IMO we're going
25 > to get those _ANYWAY_ no matter how long we wait, within reason
26 > of course.
27 >
28 > There will always be users that can't read/type/whatever and fail
29 > and file bugs.
30 >
31 > So if we have to wait for one (or more) users to forget about
32 > the initramfs crud & confusion, we'll be waiting 20 years. By
33 > then even systemd will have been replaced by something else...
34 >
35
36
37 Yeah I second this -- it was decided officially by council (what, 2
38 years ago now?) that separate-/usr-without-initramfs doesn't need to
39 be officially supported anymore, and so if things break that it is
40 up to end-users to ensure they pick up the pieces.
41
42 Although it is likely that eudev *will* keep installation onto / and
43 out of /usr to help with this not-officially-supported situation in
44 Gentoo, that doesn't mean the other projects have to stay out of
45 /usr, and "it worked before the upgrade but doesn't now" certainly
46 doesn't mean it's a valid bug. If a user or sysadmin drops their
47 initramfs when they have a separate-/usr system, any resulting
48 breakage is on them.
49
50
51 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
52 Version: GnuPG v2
53
54 iF4EAREIAAYFAla74KkACgkQAJxUfCtlWe1cVgD/YCgpgZ9QwN1KXl8G9gPjF3my
55 dW6YnrV9xzISSYpHQkMA/jDNV5epu4bzWDEmIs0g2hx8qNI3lRHMNvcORRD0lNMi
56 =nADF
57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies