Gentoo Archives: gentoo-doc

From: Tobias Heinlein <keytoaster@g.o>
To: gentoo-doc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] Date problem
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:42:49
Message-Id: 512E0D4E.9080209@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-doc] Date problem by "José Fournier"
1 Hi,
2
3 On 27.02.2013 07:26, José Fournier wrote:
4 > My question is why this discrepancy ? The files are the same, the
5 > version and date tags are identical [..]
6
7 Yes, the version and date tags of the file you mentioned
8 (hb-install-x86+amd64-medium.xml) are identical. But if you append
9 "&passthru" to the URL, e.g. :
10
11 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1&chap=2&passthru
12
13 you can see that there are other files involved as well. The XML code
14 you get there is from doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml which has
15 <date>2013-02-11</date>. That's the date the warning talks about.
16
17 You get the warning because doc/fr/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml wasn't
18 updated yet: It has <date>2010-07-19</date>. However, the date displayed
19 on the french webpage is indeed the date from
20 doc/fr/handbook/hb-install-x86+amd64-medium.xml. I suppose the date that
21 appears on the rendered page is the newest one of the dates of all the
22 files that are involved, thus ensuring that *every* part is updated.
23
24 Regards,
25 Tobias

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-doc] Date problem "José Fournier" <jaaf.forums@××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-doc] Date problem "José Fournier" <jaaf.forums@××××××××.com>