| 1 |
2009/6/26 Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××.com>:
|
| 2 |
> 2009/6/26 Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××.com>: |
| 3 |
>> 2009/6/26 Ed W <lists@××××××××××.com>: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> [snip] |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> However, to be clear I think this achieves a PIE install with no SSP? Can |
| 8 |
>>> anyone confirm this is correct? |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> That's correct. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Apologies for replying to my own post, but I just realised that you |
| 13 |
> were posing the question in the context of klondike's blog post. I do |
| 14 |
> not know what the status of SSP is in the overlays and/or experimental |
| 15 |
> toolchains so I'll bow out and leave it to one of the toolchain gurus |
| 16 |
> to provide a credible response. My answer applies to the gcc ebuild in |
| 17 |
> the mainline tree. |
| 18 |
Although I may be wrong, AFAIK SSP works nice with almost anything except libstdc++, also packages which need it to be disabled (ie thunderbird) usually do it without a problem of after pattching a bit the ebuild. Anyway, I think the best one to answer is Zorry or Xake as they maintain it.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Anyway, at least on the overlay uclibc is still not supported :( http://github.com/Xake/toolchain-overlay/blob/54581c25b74be5a5dc3d8c1de61dba55db7c639f/README |
Archives