1 |
2009/6/26 Kerin Millar <kerframil@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> 2009/6/26 Ed W <lists@××××××××××.com>: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> [snip] |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> However, to be clear I think this achieves a PIE install with no SSP? Can |
7 |
>> anyone confirm this is correct? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> That's correct. |
10 |
|
11 |
Apologies for replying to my own post, but I just realised that you |
12 |
were posing the question in the context of klondike's blog post. I do |
13 |
not know what the status of SSP is in the overlays and/or experimental |
14 |
toolchains so I'll bow out and leave it to one of the toolchain gurus |
15 |
to provide a credible response. My answer applies to the gcc ebuild in |
16 |
the mainline tree. |
17 |
|
18 |
Cheers, |
19 |
|
20 |
--Kerin |