Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Matthew Finkel <matthew.finkel@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened]
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:25:55
Message-Id: CAGF8hstr2R=8cXTas0TJdq1EZdkS=sTvcF47ZFYMeBwnpb18Zw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] by "Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón"
1 2011/8/5 Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón <tazok.id0@×××××.com>
2
3 > Don't click in the link is a fucking spammer and maybe he could be trying
4 > to exploit navigator vulnerabilities to get remote access.
5 >
6 > Please Ban the mail sender ip, is the second time he did this..
7 >
8 >
9 > 2011/8/5 Corentin Delorme <codelorme@×××××.com>
10 >
11 >> I only get a 404 error
12 >>
13 >>
14 >> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Jared Thomas <thomas_chaos@×××××.com>wrote:
15 >>
16 >>> http://alumnispecs.com/shop/admin/images/graphs/site.php?html1
17 >>>
18 >>>
19 That was my assumption, as well. It is strange that they would choose the
20 -hardened mailing list for this, though. I would think -hardened and
21 -security mailing lists would be the least likely set to fall for such
22 social engineering.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] Matt Thode <mthode@××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-hardened] "Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón" <tazok.id0@×××××.com>