Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: "Tóth Attila" <atoth@××××××××××.hu>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Required Priorities (Security) = slow server
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:02:46
Message-Id: cc5cb594068c488f89693dc6e1b991ff.squirrel@atoth.sote.hu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Required Priorities (Security) = slow server by Grant
1 That is exactly what hardened sources package maintainers do.
2 There's always a tiny time difference between the latest grsecurity patch
3 showing up on the homepage and the respective kernel ebuild appears.
4
5 *hardened-sources-3.5.1-r2 (16 Aug 2012)
6 16 Aug 2012; Anthony G. Basile (blueness)
7 +hardened-sources-3.5.1-r2.ebuild:
8 vanilla-3.5.1 + genpatches-3.5-2 + grsecurity-2.9.1-3.5.1-201208132030
9
10 They are doing a good job.
11 So: big thanks.
12
13 Dw.
14 --
15 dr Tóth Attila, Radiológus, 06-20-825-8057
16 Attila Toth MD, Radiologist, +36-20-825-8057
17
18 2012.Augusztus 17.(P) 19:06 időpontban Grant ezt írta:
19 >> I misread the part about the laptop. As far as I remember the only
20 >> supported versions by Upstream are 2.6.32.59 and 3.2.27 as stable and
21 >> 3.5.2 as testing (the versions on grsecurity.net, right now).
22 >> Other versions aren't supported by upstream.
23 >
24 > Interesting, I would have thought Gentoo would keep hardened-sources
25 > in sync with upstream's recommendation/support.
26 >
27 > - Grant
28 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Required Priorities (Security) = slow server Maxim Kammerer <mk@×××.su>
Re: [gentoo-hardened] Re: Required Priorities (Security) = slow server "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××××××.edu>