1 |
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:34:27 -0500 |
2 |
"William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 14:41 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
6 |
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:12:06 -0500 |
7 |
> > "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > > Ok by no means is this complete, covering all details, etc and so |
10 |
> > > on. It's just initial thoughts on a concept I have had for a few |
11 |
> > > months now. I have brought it up to some on occasion, in person, |
12 |
> > > irc, email, etc. I have receive mixed feedback. Hoping to open |
13 |
> > > that up a bit more here. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Well, our main problem currently is that apparently we don't have |
16 |
> > enough people capable (due to lack of time, motivation or |
17 |
> > experience) to manage such an organization, as it requires effort |
18 |
> > on things that are no fun/not interesting and not rewarding. So how |
19 |
> > do you solve that with your idea? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> While it's not guaranty or miracle solution. It's possible that we |
22 |
> would attract more people, get more time from them, more motivation, |
23 |
> and etc if those people are paid vs volunteer. Volunteering will |
24 |
> always be done on the side, for the most part. Thus subject to being |
25 |
> traded off when time/priorities change. For the non-fun and rewarding |
26 |
> things, the $ is almost a requirement. That justifies the lack of |
27 |
> fun, and provides a reward :) |
28 |
|
29 |
Please lets not mix the Gentoo project and the Gentoo Foundation at |
30 |
this point, they are two almost completely independent entities. In the |
31 |
following I'll only talk about the Foundation part. |
32 |
I understand that you have a goal in mind, however currently it's more |
33 |
important how to get away from the current state, so lets focus on |
34 |
that, not on how things eventually will be in a year. |
35 |
|
36 |
To get away from the current state we need two things (Btw, the |
37 |
attracting thing about the SFC is that they basically take care of |
38 |
both): |
39 |
A plan for a new structure (that's what your idea is about), and |
40 |
some people to get us there and manage the existing setup for the |
41 |
remaining time (that's what my questions are about). |
42 |
|
43 |
Those people have to fit two requirements: |
44 |
1) have to be trusted (or supervised, but then we need trusted |
45 |
supervisors as well) as they are going to be responsible for all |
46 |
assests of Gentoo |
47 |
2) have to be capable of dealing with the paperwork involved, that |
48 |
means time, commitment and preferably experience with such things |
49 |
|
50 |
Note that it's not required for them to be involved with the new |
51 |
structure in the end. |
52 |
|
53 |
1) is generally assumed for existing foundation members, but those |
54 |
lack 2), going by history at least |
55 |
|
56 |
2) should be assumed of externally hired professionals, but for those |
57 |
1) becomes an issue |
58 |
|
59 |
And I think it's pointless to discuss a potential new structure if |
60 |
there is nobody who'd get us there, while the SFC offers us a viable |
61 |
short- and long-term alternative (btw, does anyone have a status update |
62 |
on that?) |
63 |
|
64 |
Understand that this is independent of the new structure of the |
65 |
Foundation, which is why your answers didn't really address my |
66 |
questions (maybe I should have been more explicit) as they assume the |
67 |
new structure is already up and running. IOW I'm currently not |
68 |
interested in the "how it will be" but in the "who gets us there", or |
69 |
in business terms you plan to restructure the company but haven't |
70 |
thought yet about who will perform that restructuring. |
71 |
|
72 |
Marius |
73 |
|
74 |
-- |
75 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
76 |
|
77 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
78 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |