| 1 |
On 09/06/19 09:13, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 05:11 -0700, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Considering that the undertakers attempted recently to involuntarily retire |
| 4 |
>> a developer in spite of said developer's objection, and that said motion |
| 5 |
>> was only stopped by direct intervention from the council, I believe I have |
| 6 |
>> a good reason to advocate caution in regards to social procedures. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> This is not only an off-topic but also a blatant lie. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
Might I remind you that the description which you are calling a "blatant |
| 12 |
lie" is more diplomatically phrased than previous comments on the matter |
| 13 |
[1] by someone who was on the council at the time of the incident in |
| 14 |
question and who remains so presently? As such, it seems less a "blatant |
| 15 |
lie" and more a "politely phrased description of an apparently common |
| 16 |
impression". |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
As for it being "off-topic", this entire discussion is in regards to |
| 19 |
maintaining an accurate and up to date voter rolls for the Foundation, |
| 20 |
which you specifically advocate maintaining by requiring that all |
| 21 |
Foundation members be active Gentoo developers. The logical connection |
| 22 |
to the topic at hand seems, to borrow a term, blatantly obvious. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
In short, do kindly tone down the hyperbole, it has long since |
| 25 |
dissociated from factual reality and that is a decidedly unproductive state. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
[1] |
| 28 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/e659564c6377eef8f44d75ef666dd56a |
Archives