From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-nfp@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-nfp] [RFC] Alternative methods for determining 'interest in Foundation affairs' | ||
Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:14:02 | ||
Message-Id: | b2a18c761fd14459eefe9be271708cfbc5f42402.camel@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-nfp] [RFC] Alternative methods for determining 'interest in Foundation affairs' by Raymond Jennings |
1 | On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 05:11 -0700, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
2 | > Considering that the undertakers attempted recently to involuntarily retire |
3 | > a developer in spite of said developer's objection, and that said motion |
4 | > was only stopped by direct intervention from the council, I believe I have |
5 | > a good reason to advocate caution in regards to social procedures. |
6 | |
7 | This is not only an off-topic but also a blatant lie. |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Best regards, |
12 | Michał Górny |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-nfp] [RFC] Alternative methods for determining 'interest in Foundation affairs' | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-nfp] [RFC] Alternative methods for determining 'interest in Foundation affairs' | desultory <desultory@g.o> |