1 |
On 14/07/19 20:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote [as excerpted]: |
2 |
> |
3 |
>>> - Apply to convert from for-profit to non-profit 501(c)(6) |
4 |
>> We have discussed this before, a 501c6 does not match our purpose, does not |
5 |
>> support charitable donations being tax-exempt for the donator, and we have no |
6 |
>> intent of lobbying/supporting politics. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> The 501c6 idea justs needs to go away. |
9 |
> The charitable donations only really apply for tax residents of the USA. |
10 |
> Very few countries permit cross-border charitable donations like this |
11 |
> (Canada for example permits it only if you earn a US income or the |
12 |
> recipient is certain universities). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> For the FY2019 that just closed, as a quick analysis, our paypal gross |
15 |
> donations is approximately USD 15400.00. Of that, at least USD 9000 came |
16 |
> from non-US sources. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Lobbying is a broad definition: encouraging usage of Gentoo can be |
19 |
> construed as Lobbying. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> At a broader level in IRS definitions: |
22 |
> 501(c)(3) |
23 |
> Operated exclusively for charitable, educational, religious, literary, |
24 |
> or scientific purposes |
25 |
> 501(c)(6) |
26 |
> Operated to promote a common business interest, and to improve business |
27 |
> conditions in the industry |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Is Gentoo Linux a: |
30 |
> - charitable purpose: no |
31 |
> - educational purpose: no |
32 |
> - religious purpose: no |
33 |
> - literary purpose: no |
34 |
> - scientific purpose: no |
35 |
> - common business interest: YES |
36 |
> |
37 |
> It's on this basis that the IRS has denied 501(c)(3) existence to other |
38 |
> organizations who produce "general purpose software". The Open Source |
39 |
> Institute HAS written about this before in depth: |
40 |
> https://opensource.org/node/840 |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Also please strongly note their closing: |
43 |
> "Any FOSS project considering whether to incorporate or to apply for |
44 |
> tax-exempt status should seek the advice of an attorney experienced with |
45 |
> the laws and regulations applicable to exempt organizations." |
46 |
> |
47 |
> |
48 |
First and foremost, IANAL, etc. |
49 |
|
50 |
I personally hold an Amateur Radio license, and the purpose for which I am |
51 |
entitled to make radio transmissions is stated explicitly as 'educational |
52 |
use'. It is to share the knowledge and experience of the technology used, |
53 |
and not for broadcast purposes, or any other purposes (including emergency |
54 |
use, although the RAYNET organisation likely has some discretion here). |
55 |
|
56 |
I would argue that Gentoo is used for Educational means .. and I'm sure |
57 |
I've seen it documented such, that it is to encourage it's users to learn |
58 |
about software and computer systems, and how they may be used. I believe |
59 |
that Gentoo is in a relatively unique position amongst distributions, as a |
60 |
meta-distribution on which others are based, not to need to emphasise the |
61 |
exclusive use of the software within it as it's only application. |
62 |
|
63 |
I'm honestly not sure that you could even consider that devs actually |
64 |
'lobby' for it's use .. that would tend to imply some organised action, and |
65 |
I would still argue that what they were actually doing was simply promoting |
66 |
the features of the distribution and not insisting on its use. That is |
67 |
certainly my experience from eg. FOSDEM, and I would imagine that is the |
68 |
case elsewhere too. |
69 |
|
70 |
As initially stated, I am certainly not an expert on US or tax laws, but |
71 |
that would be my reading of the organisation as it stands today. |