1 |
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 10:01:38PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
2 |
> > To work backwards from the AGM, can we agree to set recommended |
3 |
> > periods |
4 |
> > for the election timeline: |
5 |
... |
6 |
> That all works for me. My preference is to see it written in time before |
7 |
> AGM as the AGM is not fixed. |
8 |
I should said, this was working relative to the date of any hypothetical |
9 |
AGM. Not a specific AGM happening August 15th. |
10 |
|
11 |
> > Concerns: |
12 |
> > Could somebody with a more rules-lawyer oriented thought process |
13 |
> > confirm |
14 |
> > how the 10-60 days in Bylaw 3.7 constrain the recordation date? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The two are not strictly connected. |
17 |
> The 10-60 day window is for the AGM announce. Its straight out of |
18 |
> the NM statutes. |
19 |
That's in Bylaw 3.4. |
20 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Bylaws#Section_3.4._Notice |
21 |
|
22 |
> The Record date is the date when the list of potential participants |
23 |
> in the forthcoming election is closed. Its public purpose is a call for |
24 |
> new members to join if they want to participate in the election. |
25 |
Bylaw 3.7 covering recordation ALSO mentions 10-60 days. |
26 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Foundation:Bylaws#Section_3.7._Fixing_Record_Date. |
27 |
And my question is how THAT requirement needs to be conveyed. |
28 |
E.g. Do the trustees have to give 10-60 days notice of the recordation |
29 |
date? |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
33 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer |
34 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
35 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
36 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |