Gentoo Archives: gentoo-osx

From: Grobian <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-osx@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] xorg-x11
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:37:36
Message-Id: 20051012073730.GA14244@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-osx] xorg-x11 by Kito
1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:54:53AM -0500, Kito wrote:
2 > >I'd say there is noone working on the progressive profile at the
3 > >moment. As far as I know, Kito doesn't have a progressive setup as
4 > >well. Hopefully the progressive profile will be deprecated eventually.
5 >
6 > Not sure what gave you that idea...its the only profile for OS X I
7 > find useful :p I know a few others are using it as well. Its
8
9 Right, you confuse me, but that's easy ;) I probably have a different
10 definition of 'progressive'. But if you state you use it, you can
11 easily close the bugs on them, I suppose?
12
13 > basically the proving ground for the portage base-system packages.
14 > Its also whats used for Darwin development, as building Darwin system
15 > packages requires a heavily modified OS X environment. I don't plan
16 > on deprecating it at all, if you feel strongly otherwise, maybe you
17 > should split the profiles up (again) and let the collision-protect
18 > profiles that install packages to / (non-prefixed) live in profiles/
19 > default-macos and leave profiles/default-darwin for, well, darwin.
20
21 I would think that the current default-macos profiles should get
22 deprecated somehow in their current form and replaced by a prefix
23 thing...
24
25 For me, non-collision-protect stuff is dangerous/progressive. By using
26 a prefix, a lot of (if not all of) the collision-protect issues should
27 go away (like with fink for example), hence if you then still want
28 something progressive, it will mean something else to me like it means
29 to me now. It will be a misunderstanding from my side, but a separation
30 of alt/darwin and alt/macos might be approriate at that stage, since
31 progressive/darwin then clearly has not the sole purpose to extend and
32 enrich an Apple OSX install. Sounds more like progressive wants to
33 build a Darwin system (perhaps even kernel) with portage as package
34 manager. This is completely cool, but not my cup of tea, and a whole
35 new definition of progressive to me. So maybe we should start a new
36 thread on what progressive actually means/is? :)
37
38 --
39 Fabian Groffen
40 Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
41 --
42 gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-osx] xorg-x11 Finn Thain <fthain@××××××××××××××××.au>