| 1 |
> Sounds like you should read: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/macos/targets.xml |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> If I'm not mistaken, you want the "Darwin Portage"-type setup. If you |
| 6 |
> read the "Road Map" section, you will see that it's been decided to |
| 7 |
> head in the "Gentoo Portage for Mac OS X" direction (i.e. prefix). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I'm sure that no one would object if you decided to head up your own |
| 10 |
> "Darwin Portage" project, as there would be some overlap. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I don't think I have the time or will to implement my own Gentoo subproject. |
| 13 |
If a prefix based approach is implemented, I think I will have to switch to |
| 14 |
Fink or DarwinPorts, where at least exist a _fixed_ prefix, where I can |
| 15 |
depend upon. |
| 16 |
I would regret this, because I still think that Gentoo in its current form |
| 17 |
is the more "pure" approach. |
| 18 |
My ideal would still be to implement a thing like a unionfs which allows |
| 19 |
clean overriding of system level libraries. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards |
| 22 |
Dirk |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-osx@g.o mailing list |
Archives