Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: kdebuild-1 conditionals
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:06:39
Message-Id: 20091211203521.GH6529@hrair
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: kdebuild-1 conditionals by Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:38:57PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:24:45 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > >> Patch is attached. Please review and commit. > > > > > Please point me to the reasonable steps you have taken to ensure > > > that there are no users with kdebuild-1 packages installed. > > > > See the rest of this thread, no need to repeat things. > > I shall refer you to 20080828: > > > Decision: Council will vote to resolve conflicts that the PMS editors > > and PM developers weren't able to resolve. > > There is a conflict that won't be resolved until I'm convinced that the > reasonable steps I've requested to ensure that the impact of this > change is as minimal as possible have been followed. If you'd like to > convince me of that here, there's no need for a Council vote; > otherwise, we'll follow the procedure.
Frankly, taking this to the council gets my vote. PMS cannot be ran in such a way that one person stonewalling is able to hold up the majority's will. That's always been a flaw w/ how it was managed and has impacted the resultant spec several times over. If you want to stonewall this, go for it- it would be good to see the council smack it down just for the sake of making it harder in the future for this particular card to be played. Also, unless I'm on crack, the person leading PMS is fauli- I'd expect he's the one who can pull the veto trick, not you. ~harring


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] Re: kdebuild-1 conditionals Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>