1 |
Il giorno mar 5 ott 2021 alle ore 10:31 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> ha |
2 |
scritto: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi, everyone. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I've been thinking about this for some time already, and the recent |
7 |
> FILESDIR mess seems to confirm it: I'd like to start a more stable LTS |
8 |
> branch of Portage. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Roughly, the idea is that: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> - master becomes 3.1.x, and primary development happens there |
13 |
> |
14 |
> - 3.0.x becomes the LTS branch and only major bugfixes are backported |
15 |
> there |
16 |
> |
17 |
> As things settle down in the future, master would become 3.2.x, 3.1.x |
18 |
> would become LTS, 3.0.x will be discontinued and so on. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> WDYT? |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Sorry but portage is too strictly related to the ebuilds in tree, recent |
24 |
removal of EAPI=5 from most eclasses underlined that. |
25 |
Or to put id differently if you want a LTS portage you also need a certain |
26 |
number of "protected" eclasses and ebuilds |
27 |
It seems a lot of (very appreciated but don't count on me) work |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> Best regards, |
34 |
> Michał Górny |
35 |
> |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> |