| 1 |
Ah, good. You got me scared for a second. It does however make sense |
| 2 |
for it to be removed. Many dispatch-conf bugs are left untouched for |
| 3 |
months since the dev that wrote it disappeared without notice. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Maybe if I post some patches they'll be commited, but seems anything |
| 6 |
dispatch-conf related is halted at the moment. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:44:35 +0200, Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:46:14AM +0000, Roman Gaufman wrote: |
| 10 |
> > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:52:16 +0200, Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote: |
| 11 |
> > What do you mean until .51_rc9? -- will it be included in .51? |
| 12 |
> > There's no way in hell I'm moving back to etc-update -- and frankly, I |
| 13 |
> > dont see how anyone can tolerate it :) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> No, sorry for the confusion. What I meant was that I currently still have |
| 16 |
> _rc9 on my system so _if_ for some obscure reason dispatch-conf _would have |
| 17 |
> been moved_ to gentoolkit afterwards I wouldn't know it. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> But that's not the case. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Wkr, |
| 24 |
> Sven Vermeulen |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> Documentation & PR project leader |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives