Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 12:44:35
Message-Id: 20041021124435.GA14754@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary by Roman Gaufman
1 On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:46:14AM +0000, Roman Gaufman wrote:
2 > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:52:16 +0200, Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> wrote:
3 > What do you mean until .51_rc9? -- will it be included in .51?
4 > There's no way in hell I'm moving back to etc-update -- and frankly, I
5 > dont see how anyone can tolerate it :)
6
7 No, sorry for the confusion. What I meant was that I currently still have
8 _rc9 on my system so _if_ for some obscure reason dispatch-conf _would have
9 been moved_ to gentoolkit afterwards I wouldn't know it.
10
11 But that's not the case.
12
13 Wkr,
14 Sven Vermeulen
15
16 --
17 Documentation & PR project leader
18
19 The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary Roman Gaufman <hackeron@×××××.com>