Archives
Archives
| From: | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:43:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4416CA3A.5000008@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better by tvali |
||
| 1 | tvali wrote: |
| 2 | > I did think about some priorities too, so that it could be perfect for me. |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > It should be possible to add package with a priority. I will give you an |
| 5 | > use case and explanation how i would use portage. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Heh, make the dep resolver even more complex ;) |
| 8 | Also don't really see a need for such a feature, pretty much no benefit |
| 9 | with a lot of additional complexity. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Marius |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better | solar <solar@g.o> |