| 1 |
Dne 12.2.2011 16:50, Pacho Ramos napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> Then, my idea would the following: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Would be nice if I could tell portage to make compilation think |
| 5 |
> libglitz-glx.so.1 is not present in real system (maybe sandbox could |
| 6 |
> prevent its readability inside build environment), and then, I could run |
| 7 |
> "revdep-rebuild --library libglitz-glx.so.1" before removing glitz and |
| 8 |
> affected apps would not link to it, allowing me to safely remove glitz |
| 9 |
> later without having had a broken system at any time. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What do you think? Thanks |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I think you want to update to portage-2.2 (you need to unmask it |
| 14 |
manually). It does exactly what you want in this case. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Martin Doucha |
Archives