Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | ||
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:06:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 438227FD.3030103@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage by capitalista |
||
| 1 | capitalista wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > The file grouping would be excellent in the sense that you could tar |
| 4 | > up a directory and make it available for others people to use, and all |
| 5 | > you would need to do is extract it to /etc/portage/includes. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Does it often make sense to group a set of package.* files together? Can you provide one or more examples of how this is useful? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Zac |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | capitalista <capitalista@×××××.com> |