1 |
Hi Rich! |
2 |
El 27/03/18 a las 01:01, Rich Freeman escribió: |
3 |
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera |
4 |
> (klondike) <klondike@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> the majority of the stakeholders of the Gentoo Social Contract (anybody |
6 |
>> other than Gentoo developers and those vouched by them) |
7 |
> I just did some asking around and those non-developer stakeholders |
8 |
> (who are apparently a majority of our total set of stakeholders) say |
9 |
> that they disagree with your proposed changes. Are you sure you |
10 |
> actually talked to all of them? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> It is possible that there is some confusion - could you provide a list |
13 |
> of the names of these stakeholders who apparently constitute a |
14 |
> majority? Gentoo devs apparently don't count for much (other than |
15 |
> doing all the work I suppose), but we can at least generate a list of |
16 |
> who they are... |
17 |
|
18 |
Please don't derail the topic. If you want to discuss who are the |
19 |
specific stakeholders affected by the Gentoo Social Contract you are |
20 |
more than welcome to open a different thread, on gentoo-project. |
21 |
|
22 |
I opened this thread to discuss proposals to fix the fact that with the |
23 |
permission change of the gentoo-dev mailing list ordered by the council, |
24 |
the majority of the stakeholders of the Gentoo Social Contract (anybody |
25 |
other than Gentoo developers and those vouched by them) can't neither |
26 |
propose nor discuss changes to said contract through the official |
27 |
channels. If you have any input in that regard, I'll be more than happy |
28 |
to read it. |
29 |
|
30 |
Klondike |