| 1 |
On 11/13/2016 02:45 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 13/11/16 01:44, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 11/13/2016 02:40 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 8:24:12 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> In either case the person affected can appeal to Council which makes |
| 6 |
>>>> the final decision. |
| 7 |
>>> If a problem went from Team Lead, or Leads, to a vote from the entire council. |
| 8 |
>>> An appeal should not be necessary. There should not be an appeal process or |
| 9 |
>>> need. Such things should not occur and everyone should be doing everything |
| 10 |
>>> possible to prevent it. Thus again nothing to appeal. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> This is already the case where technical issues are discussed in a |
| 13 |
>> professional manner not involving personal conflicts. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> With respect, Kristian, I really don't believe we have a problem with |
| 17 |
> technical matters ... ;] |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The description above is a normative description of how things works in |
| 21 |
the general case, which doesn't involve comrel. The latter is only |
| 22 |
involved when the usual dispute resolution is not applicable due to |
| 23 |
personnel making technical issues personal. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 27 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 28 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives